Legal Opinion

United States v. Phez Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 6, 1928No. Nos. 5443, 5444PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

Section 628 of the Revenue Act of 1918, 40 Stat. 1116 (Comp. St. § 6161%d (a), provides that there shall be paid “upon all unfermented grape juice, ginger ale, root beer, sarsaparilla, pop, artificial mineral waters (carbonated and not.carbonated), other carbonated waters or beverages, and other soft drinks, sold by the manufacturer, producer, or importer, in bottles or other closed containers, a tax equivalent to 10 per centum of the price for which so sold.” Under the provisions of that act the Northwest Fruit Products Company, a corporation, and the Phez Company, a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. United States v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  3. Cope v. CopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. United States v. SteverSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. LustigCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  2. Geer v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1950
  3. United States Nat. Bank of Portland v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1960
  4. Blackard v. JonesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Kern v. GranquistDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API