Legal Opinion

Pierson v. Canupp

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 6, 1988No. 63027Published

1Opinion of the Court

754 P.2d 548 (1988)

Laura Canupp PIERSON, Appellee and Counter-Appellant,

v.

Otis CANUPP, Appellant and Counter-Appellee.

No. 63027.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

May 3, 1988.

As Corrected May 6, 1988.

L. Wayne Woodyard, Pawhuska, for appellant and counter-appellee.

Robert A. Flynn, Tulsa, for appellee and counter-appellant.

OPALA, Justice.

Two questions are presented for our decision: [1] Is the father's quest for corrective relief from the trial court's "certified interlocutory order" dismissible for his failure to establish an aggrieved-party status and because the trial judge's certification is…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Flick v. CrouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Horizons, Inc. v. Keo Leasing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Lawrence v. Cleveland County Home Loan AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. Underside v. LathropSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API