Pierson v. Canupp
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
754 P.2d 548 (1988)
Laura Canupp PIERSON, Appellee and Counter-Appellant,
v.
Otis CANUPP, Appellant and Counter-Appellee.
No. 63027.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
May 3, 1988.
As Corrected May 6, 1988.
L. Wayne Woodyard, Pawhuska, for appellant and counter-appellee.
Robert A. Flynn, Tulsa, for appellee and counter-appellant.
OPALA, Justice.
Two questions are presented for our decision: [1] Is the father's quest for corrective relief from the trial court's "certified interlocutory order" dismissible for his failure to establish an aggrieved-party status and because the trial judge's certification is…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Flick v. CrouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Horizons, Inc. v. Keo Leasing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Lawrence v. Cleveland County Home Loan AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Underside v. LathropSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.