Loyd Carroll Grandsinger v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
The appellant was indicted for transporting in interstate commerce a motor vehicle knowing the same had been stolen, in violation of § 2312, Title 18 U.S.C. He was tried by a jury, convicted, and has taken this appeal asserting several errors by the trial court.
The appellant first urges that the trial court was in error in refusing on the voir dire examination of prospective jurors to explain to them the terms, “reasonable doubt” and “presumption of innocence,” and also in refusing to ask the jurors whether or not they would give the accused the benefit of such rules. The court did question…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- John Thomas Fitts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Seefeldt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Speak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- John Thomas Fitts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Roy B. Kelly, Cecil v. Hagen and Milton J. ShuckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Kojo Sababu, Jaime Delgado, and Dora GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Bruce A. Beckman, United States of America v. Thomas KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Commonwealth v. RhoadesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.