Legal Opinion

McCallum v. Quarles

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 28, 1958No. 37016PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge.

1. The plaintiff’s petition does not allege, as contended by the defendants, that the defendants are estopped by their actions to deny that he is aYpeace officer” within the meaning of the Peace Officers’ Annuity and Benefit Fund of Georgia (Code, Ann., Ch. 78-9). Accordingly the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of McCallum v. Almand, 213 Ga. 701 (100 S. E. 2d 924), is not applicable, nor does such petitioner plead in the alternative so as to require a ruling that if one theory is bad the whole pleading is bad. See Richards & Associates, Inc. v. Studstill, 212 Ga. 375…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  2. Richards & Associates, Inc. v. StudstillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  3. Felton v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  4. McCallum v. AlmandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCallum v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  2. Hamrick v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  3. McCallum v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  4. McCallum v. RaineyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API