McCallum v. Almand
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hawkins, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The controlling question to be determined is whether the petitioner’s service either as county commissioner and policeman, or as coroner, constituted such peace officer’s service as would entitle him to participate in the retirement fund, for it would require credit for service in both capacities to total twenty years’ service. The act creating the Peace Officers Annuity and Benefit Fund of Georgia, at the time petitioner alleges he became a member, defined the term “peace officer” as follows: “The term ‘peace officer,’ as used in this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Peacock v. HorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Rieves v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Drost v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Cole v. FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Sibley v. ParkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Withers v. RegisterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Moody v. IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Southern Railway Co. v. A. O. Smith Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Board of Commissioners of Peace Officers Annuity & Benefit Fund v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Tate v. Teachers Retirement System of Ga.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.