Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. George H. Hurd Realty Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 25, 1927No. 25,764PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L®es_, C.
In an action to recover damages for death by wrongful act, the court directed a verdict for the defendants. Plaintiff has appealed from an order denying her motion for a new trial.
The complaint alleged and the proof showed that the defendant realty company was the lessee of a building in the city of St. Paul, located at 388 Jackson street; that the defendant Adams was a sublessee of the realty company, in possession of the property on September 30, 1925, and about to open a restaurant on the first floor of the building.
The complaint alleged in effect that on September 30, at Adams’…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Menteer v. Scalzo Fruit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Mazey v. LovelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
3Cited by10 opinions
- Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Van Avery v. Platte Valley Land & Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1937
- Wilson v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- McGenty v. John A. Stephenson & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Landy v. Olson & Serley Sash & Door Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.