Legal Opinion

Coe v. Gregory

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1884PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Barry. (Hooker, J.) Replevin. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

This is an action of replevin, to recover for the value of property taken by the marshal of the village of Nashville, to satisfy a tax for the year 1882, levied upon the property of the plaintiff by virtue of a warrant issued by the authorities of the village in pursuance of Act No. 179, Laws 1873. No question arises upon the pleadings. The case is before us upon findings of fact and law solely.

The court finds the defendant was marshal at the time the suit was commenced, and as such was engaged in collecting the taxes for the village under his warrant, duly issued upon an assessment properly…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Albuquerque v. Water Supply Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Staton v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Louisville & N. R. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
  4. State ex rel. Childs v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. State v. HonerudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API