Legal Opinion
Shorr v. Kind
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 1, 1991No. F013937PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HARRIS, J.—
Introduction
Michael Shorr appeals from an order sustaining a demurrer to his first amended cross-complaint for malicious prosecution. The order was sustained with 10 days leave to amend. Appellant prematurely filed notice of appeal. Subsequent to the filing of the notice of appeal, a judgment of dismissal was entered on the action for plaintiff’s failure to amend his action within 10 days.
Facts and Proceedings Below
We resist the temptation to make the factual statement more complex and detailed than is necessary to identify and form the issues presented in this appeal. The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re Sambo's Restaurants, Inc., a California Corporation, Debtor. Sambo's Restaurants, Inc., a California Corporation v. Peggy WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Robert A. Sikes and Janice K. Sikes v. Global Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- William Wayne Picco v. Global Marine Drilling Company, and Crosbie Offshore Services, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- In Re Nita B. Smith, Debtor. Nita B. Smith, Cross-Appellant v. First America Bank, N.A., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- White v. City of Santee (In Re White)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Shah v. Glendale Federal BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Metro Bulletins Corp. v. SoboleskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Starpoint Properties v. NamvarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- ECC Construction Inc. v. Oak Park Calabasas Homeowners Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.