Legal Opinion

State v. Village of South Orange

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

*255The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

The question involved in this controversy is whether, under existing laws, the village of South Orange has the right to construct sewers for the purpose of carrying its sewage outside of its own corporate limits into the township of Millburn, to be there disposed of upon lands purchased for a sewage receptacle.

The validity of the ordinances of the defendant corporation authorizing this work is controverted for a number of reasons, which have been elaborately argued, but in the view taken by the court the discussion will be within narrower…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Darlington v. . Mayor, C., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  5. County of Richland v. County of LawrenceIllinois Supreme Court · 1850

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Standard Chemical & Oil Co. v. City of TroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. City of Birmingham v. Hood-Mcpherson Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Sellers v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Frelinghuysen v. Town of MorristownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  5. State v. Inhabitants of TrentonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API