Legal Opinion

Bigham v. Dempster

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1995No. 95-0075PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gammage

joined by Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justice HIGHTOWER, Justice HECHT, Justice CORNYN, and Justice ENOCH.

These child custody proceedings present a dominant jurisdiction problem. The procedural facts are complicated, but the legal problem is simple. The legal issue is when a transfer order becomes “docketed” in the transferee court to deprive the transferring court of jurisdiction over the children. We hold that when a certified copy of the transfer order has been presented to the judge of the transferee court, who proceeds as though the case were docketed by having the clerk assign a number and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. O'CONNOR v. First Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Abor v. BlackTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Curtis v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Carle v. CarleTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Proffer v. YatesTexas Supreme Court · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re U.S. Silica Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Pinnacle Gas Treating, Inc. v. ReadTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In Re Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  4. In re Grecon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  5. In re GormanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API