Legal Opinion

Haug v. Wallace Lake Sanitary District

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 27, 1986No. 85-1321PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.

The appellants brought a declaratory judgement action seeking a determination that the Wallace Lake Sanitary District or the Town of Trenton, or both, have the authority to redefine the physical boundaries of the Sanitary District. The circuit court concluded, correctly we hold, that neither entity has such power under the statutes. The only means to such an end authorized by the legislature is the dissolution of the District and the creation of a new sanitary district, upon the filing of the proper petitions.

James Haug and the other appellants are landowners within the borders of Wallace…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hainz v. Shopko Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  2. Adamczyk v. Town of CaledoniaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Fort Howard Paper Co. v. Fox River Heights Sanitary DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Plachta v. PlachtaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  5. Schroeder v. City of ClintonvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. Board of CommissionersWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Town of Beloit v. County of RockCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  3. Dittberner v. Windsor Sanitary District Number 1Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  4. Donaldson v. Board of CommissionersWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Town of Clayton v. CARDINAL CONST. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API