Legal Opinion

Howard v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 28, 1999No. 95-595CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, Chief Judge.

This ease is before the court on defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, for Summary Judgment and plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs claim concerns the Social Security “offset” being applied by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service against her Military Survivor Benefit Plan annuity procured by her late husband.

*731FACTS

Plaintiffs second husband, John P. Howard, died on June 17,1995, having achieved a final grade of Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Air Force. At the time of his death, Lieutenant Colonel Howard was receiving…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Cummings v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  3. Zelma Weinfield v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Miller v. McGovernCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Demutiis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API