Zelma Weinfield v. United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Zelma Weinfield appeals the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the United States in her action challenging the calculation of benefits she receives under the Survivor Benefit Plan (“SBP”). We review de novo, United States v. Hatcher, 922 F.2d 1402, 1405 (9th Cir.1991), and we affirm.
I. Factual & Procedural Background
In 1972, Congress created the SBP to provide income to the surviving spouses of members of the military services who die after becoming eligible to retire. S.Rep. No. 92-1089, 92d Cong., 2d Sess. 1, reprinted in 1972 U.S.C.C.A.N. 3288, 3289.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schweiker v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dodge v. Board of Ed. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Don Kirshner, and Schumaier, Roberts & McKinsey v. Uniden Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- North Side Lumber Co. v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gomez v. Martin Marietta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Arnold v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Howard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Gail Schneyer v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Timothy Demond Pate v. Leon T. RocheDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026