Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Central Foundry Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 5, 1982No. 81-26PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SHORES, Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case because it directly raises an issue of first impression never decided by this Court, viz.:

Is a provision in a policy providing workmen’s compensation which allows a direct action on the policy by the injured employee valid? Or, stated differently, does any provision of the Workmen’s Compensation Act invalidate a contractual provision allowing a direct action? We hold that the contractual provision is valid and enforceable and is not invalidated by the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

A widow filed suit for workmen’s compensation death benefits…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Read News Agency, Inc. v. MomanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  2. Den-Tal-Eze Mfg. Co. v. GosaCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  3. Thomason v. Midland Ins. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. Central Foundry Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API