Legal Opinion

Thomason v. Midland Ins. Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 6, 1980No. Civ. 2086PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a workmen's compensation case.

The employee appeals from the granting of the defendant insurer's motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

This case does not come to this court in the context of a dispute over factual matters. The dispositive issue is whether, as a matter of law, a direct action for work related injuries can be brought against the employer's insurer when the provisions of § 25-5-8 (f)(4), Code of Ala. 1975, have not been met.

Section 25-5-8 (f)(4) provides in pertinent part:(4) DIRECT ACTIONS AGAINST INSURERS. — If the employer shall insure to his employees the payment of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Quick v. Utotem of AlabamaCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  2. Humphrey v. PossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. Pounds v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Read News Agency, Inc. v. MomanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  2. Stinson v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  3. Lawler & Cole Cpas, LLC v. ColeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
  4. Wilson v. Central Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Lawler & Cole Cpas, LLC v. ColeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API