Legal Opinion

(PS) Holcomb v. Pfizer Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 16, 2024No. 1:20-cv-01008Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID L. HOLCOMB, SR., No. 1:20-cv-1008-KJM-KJN (PS) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 13 v. (ECF No. 58.) 14 PFIZER, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, who proceeds without counsel in this action, seeks monetary damages for 18 injuries allegedly sustained via his use of defendant Pfizer’s drug Lipitor. (See ECF No. 51 (the 19 first amended complaint (“1AC”).) Presently before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss 20 for a failure to state a claim and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API