Legal Opinion
Weldon v. De Martini
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 3, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLester Holtzman, J.
This is an application for an order determining the petitioner’s lien for services rendered as attorney for the respondents in 32 “ litigated ” and 14 nonlitigated matters. The respondents cross-move to dismiss the application on the ground that the same is inappropriate, premature and legally insufficient.
Respondents contend that the application is- inappropriate and premature inasmuch as the petitioner has not submitted an itemized bill for his services. Petitioner, however, is seeking payment for his services on the basis of quantum meruit and *711any bill lie might submit would not be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re SebringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Matter of Cooper (Mccauley)New York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Matter of Brown (Gerdes)New York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Schwartz v. SchwartzNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Ader v. PurcellNew York Supreme Court · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Spinello v. SpinelloNew York Supreme Court · 1972
- Regan v. Marco M. Frisone, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Owen v. ForchelliCivil Court of the City of New York · 1964
- In re Taylor, Jacoby & CampoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Manganaro v. H. J. R. Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967