Ader v. Purcell
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPecora, J.
A hybrid proceeding has been attempted here. A summons together with a petition seeking relief pursuant to section 475 of the Judiciary Law has been served in which petitioners are designated as plaintiffs and respondents as defendants. Since there is no action, the summons must be dismissed.. Nor is it a special proceeding, which is commenced by the service of a notice of motion or order to show cause and a petition. The summons cannot take the place of a notice of motion. Furthermore the petition clearly shows that section 475 of the Judiciary Law is inapplicable, since the petitioners…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Cox v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Owen v. ForchelliCivil Court of the City of New York · 1964
- Weldon v. De MartiniNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- De La Paz v. Coastal Petroleum Transport Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Taraborrelli v. VinciguerraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966