Legal Opinion
McClune v. Shamah
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 8, 1979No. 78-1795PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Chief Judge.
I
Cedar Bayou, Ltd., a Pennsylvania limited partnership, appeals from an order of the district court denying its motion to intervene in this lawsuit, brought by all of its limited partners.
The limited partners filed suit in the district court on August 19, 1977, asserting causes of action under the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and pendent claims arising from their investment in Cedar Bayou, Ltd. Their complaint alleges securities fraud, mismanagement and breaches of common law duties arising from Cedar Bayou’s formation and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fuller v. VolkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Klebanow v. New York Produce ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Southern Railway Company and Central of Georgia Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Southern Railway Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1974
3Cited by39 opinions
- Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Francisco Pujol v. Shearson/american Express, Inc., Appeal of Ana Bonelli De PujolCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Rose v. Arkansas Valley Environmental & Utility AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1983
- Engl Ex Rel. Plymouth Plaza Associates v. BergDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- McKay v. HeyisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.