Grondin v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Schoolcraft. (Steere, J.) Submitted on briefs May 1, 1894. Decided June 2, 1894. Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the* opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
The plaintiff's horse was killed by a train of the defendant near a station called Seney, in the county of Schoolcraft. The point where the horse was killed was between 300 and 400 feet east of the east switch at the station. The liability is founded upon the failure to fence its road as required by the statute.
Seney is a place of about 300 inhabitants. Neither the highways, the railroad, nor any land in the vicinity is fenced, except a few gardens. One of the principal highways runs parallel with the railroad, immediately on the-north of it, and occupies a part of the defendant's right, of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McGrath v. Detroit, Mackinac & Marquette R. R.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rabidon v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Wilmot v. Oregon RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Burnham v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1909
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. McCallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Anderson v. Cook County State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.