Legal Opinion

Myers v. Field

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 1, 1893Published

Memorandum.—Creditor’s bill. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Oliver H. Horton, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1892, and affirmed.

1Opinion of the Court

.Opinion oe the Court,

Cart, P. J.

In August, 1888, the appellees recovered a judgment against the appellant, which remains unsatisfied, execution having been returned “no property found.” She has in her possession, either in money or securities,* the means with which to pay the judgment, and the court did “ therefore order, adjudge and decree that” * * * she -x- -x- -x- «d0 immediately pay and satisfy the whole amount due upon said judgment,” etc.

The object of the appellees is manifestly to get the benefit of the process of attachment. National Park Bank v. Halle, 41 Ill. App. 19, affirmed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago, Pekin & Southwestern Railroad v. President of the Town of MarseillesIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Halle v. National Park Bank of New YorkIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. National Park Bank of New York v. HalleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
  4. Sternberg v. StraussAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API