National Park Bank of New York v. Halle

The only new features in the facts of this case, distinguishing it from what it was shown to have been on the former appeal, 30 Ill. App. 17, are:

First: That it now appears that Ascher and Barnard bought the goods from Halle in good faith, and paid for them before this case was remanded on that appeal. It is not now questioned that on the hearing thereafter the bill was rightly dismissed as to Ascher and Barnard.

Second: That Halle mixed the money received for the goods with his general funds.

The Superior Court entered a decree against him, reciting that he was liable for the amount received,…