High Plains Resources, LLC v. Fall River County Board of Commissioners
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SEVERSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] High Plains sought a writ of pro-, hibition. It alleged, that the Fall River County Board of Commissioners (Board), acted outside its authority by rescinding Resolution 2014-09, .which approved-High Plains’ proposed petroleum contaminated soil'farm. Further, it alleged that a referral of. a similar, subsequently enacted Resolution 2014-16 would be of no legal effect. The circuit court agreed and found that High Plains did not have a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the course of law. Therefore, it issued a writ setting aside the rescission of Resolution 2014-09…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- South Dakota Board of Regents v. HeegeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- H & W Contracting, LLC v. City of WatertownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- McElhaney v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Apa v. ButlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Walker v. Bd. of County Com'rs of BruleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Huber v. Hanson Cty. Planning Comm'n.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2019