Carlson v. Stork
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
HOLT, Justice.
Defendants appeal from the order denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
The action is to recover for personal injuries received when a truck owned by defendants Stork Bros., a partnership, and operated by defendant Walter Schreiner, a servant of the partnership, collided Avith a Buick car driven by plaintiff. The complaint charged the driver of the truck with various acts of negligence and that such negligence caused the collision. The ansAver denied all negligence of the driver and averred that plaintiff Avas guilty of sundry acts of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mechler v. McMahonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Coffman v. KummerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Salera v. SchroederSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kolatz v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Greene v. MathiowetzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Jablinske v. EckstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- State v. SpragueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Donaldson v. CarstensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933