Legal Opinion

Buckley v. Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 10, 1993No. Nos. 92-3279, 92-3291, 92-3283PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

We are asked to declare unconstitutional a rule promulgated by the Supreme Court of Illinois to regulate the speech of candidates for state judicial office. The rule provides that “a candidate, including an incumbent judge, for a judicial office filled by election or retention ... should not make pledges or promises of conduct in office other than the faithful and impartial performance of the duties of the office; announce his views on disputed legal or political issues; or misrepresent his identity ... or other fact; provided, however, that he may announce his views on…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Ada Van Harken v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Morton Nesses v. Randall T. ShepardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. David Johnson v. Supreme Court of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  4. Bauer v. ShepardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. James D. Hood II v. Ronald T. Keller Richard H. Finan Kenneth L. MorckelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API