Legal Opinion
James D. Hood II v. Ronald T. Keller Richard H. Finan Kenneth L. Morckel
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 3, 2003No. 02-3402PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant James D. Hood II brought suit in federal district court against defendant-appellee Ronald Keller, in his official capacity as the Executive Director of the Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board; defendant-appellee Richard Finan, in his official capacity as the Chairman of the Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board; and defendant-appel-lee Kenneth Morckel, in his official capacity as the Superintendent of the Ohio State Highway Patrol, challenging the constitutionality of Ohio Administrative Code § 128-4. This provision requires that all…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bianchi v. RylaarsdamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Dlx, Inc. v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- John Berry, Jr. v. Michael SchmittCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Hall v. CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Executive Arts Studio, Inc., D/B/A Velvet Touch v. City of Grand RapidsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Maymó-Meléndez v. Álvarez-RamírezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.