Schinzel v. Vuyk
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
The complaint, in this libel action, was assailed for insufficiency under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The learned justice below held (1) that no publication was shown, and (2) that the alleged defamatory matter was not libelous per se. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant wrote to a Mr. Herzberg, a person who is not directly identified in the complaint, a letter in which, after complaining of the conduct of the plaintiff in a business transaction between plaintiff and defendant, and characterizing that conduct as “ anything but fair and scrupulous,” defendant says: “ Such…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Moore v. . FrancisNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Wells v. Belstrat Hotel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
3Cited by6 opinions
- Willis v. Demopolis Nursing Home, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Freeman v. Dayton Scale Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1929
- Maine v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- Springer v. SwiftSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Lawler v. MerrittNew York Supreme Court · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.