Legal Opinion
Atlantic Healthcare Benefits Trust v. Googins
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 2, 1993No. 1542, Docket 92-7955PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs are a group of individuals and entities that arrange with employers to provide employee health care benefits. When the State of Connecticut began taking steps to subject the benefits arrangement to regulation as an insurance company, the plaintiffs sued the Connecticut Commissioner of Insurance (the “Commissioner”) and the Connecticut Department of Insurance. Plaintiffs seek (a) a declaration that the health care benefits they supply are furnished through a multiple employer welfare arrangement (“MEWA”) that is subject to regulation under the Employee…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Alabama v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Cynthia A. Richardson v. New York State Department of Correctional Service, Auburn Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Parella v. Retirement Board of the Rhode Island Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Pedro Leonardo Mascheroni v. Board of Regents of the University of California, University of California, Los Alamos National LaboratoryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Fuller v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Sullivan v. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.