Legal Opinion

Wayne and Donna Kirchgessner v. Betty Kirchgessner, Albert Kirchgessner, Norbert Kirchgessner, Marcella Kirchgessner, Stephen Kirchgessner, Mary Ann Lee, Fred Kirchgessner

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 2018No. 10A01-1710-CP-2309PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vaidik, Chief Judge.

Case Summary

[1] Indiana Rule of Trial Procedure 60(B)(7) allows a court to grant relief from a judgment if (1) "the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged," (2) "a prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or otherwise vacated," or (3) "it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application." Rule 60(B) provides that a motion for such relief "shall be filed within a reasonable time." In this case, the trial court granted relief under the third clause of Rule 60(B)(7)-the "no longer equitable" provision-and the appealing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cavens v. ZaberdacIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. United States Gypsum, Inc. v. Indiana Gas Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. James T. Mitchell v. 10th and The Bypass, LLC and Elway, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Parham v. ParhamIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. State v. Martinsville Development Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dreyer & Reinbold v. Madison Auto Sales, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. Steven M. Shockley v. Indiana Real Estate Appraiser Licensure and Certification BoardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API