Legal Opinion
Marburger v. Upper Hanover Township
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 4, 2002No. 2:00-cv-06492PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Judith Marburger sued Upper Hanover Township (“the Township”) and the Upper Hanover Township Board of Supervisors (“the Board”) alleging she was sexually harassed by her manager, the Township Secretary, who was also an elected member of the Board. After the Township Secretary resigned, Plaintiff contends she assumed his duties for months and was discriminatorily denied a pay increase commensurate with her new level of responsibility. She alleges she was retaliated against when she was denied a formal promotion to the Township Manager…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Angeline OSTAPOWICZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHNSON BRONZE COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Keim v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wanda Birch v. Cuyahoga County Probate Court John J. Donnelly, Presiding JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Scott Clews v. County of SchuylkillCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Jones v. Amerihealth CaritasDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Reardon v. HerringDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
- Lifrak v. New York City CouncilDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.