Legal Opinion
D.A. NOLT, INC. v. THE PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 28, 2020No. 2:18-cv-04997Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA D.A. NOLT, INC., : Plaintiff : CIVIL ACTION : THE PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL No. 18-4997 AUTHORITY, et al., . : Defendants : MEMORANDUM PRATTER, J. say oo The parties dispute whether the liquidated damages provision included in a construction contract was itself constructed on a base of reasonable forecast of actual damages. The City of Philadelphia and the Philadelphia Municipal Authority seek to enforce a $10,000 per diem liquidated damages provision based only on their project director’s recollections of pre-estimates…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Betts v. New Castle Youth Development CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Pantuso Motors, Inc. v. Corestates BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- A. G. Cullen Construction, Inc. v. State System of Higher EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.