Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Schall

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1972No. Appeal, No. 337 C.D. 1972PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Bowman,

The narrow and novel issue raised in this appeal is whether the lower court erred in refusing to grant the Commonwealth an evidentiary hearing on its motion for preliminary injunction filed incident to its commencement of litigation by a complaint in equity.

The order appealed from is one which passes upon preliminary objections filed by defendants and which directs the case to be assigned for hearing on the merits after the pleadings have been closed. The refusal to conduct a hearing on plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction is found in the opinion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. IsraelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. United Electrical, Radio & MacHine WorkersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. STANDER v. KelleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schulman v. Franklin & Marshall CollegeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Franklin Decorators, Inc. v. Hende-Jon Furniture Showrooms, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Nether Providence Township v. ColettaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Sameric Corp. v. Valley Forge Center Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. MooseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API