Legal Opinion

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Moose

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1987No. 461PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

James R. Moose, Robert L. Beard, and James R. Rohr-baugh became employees of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (Merrill Lynch) in late 1983 and early 1984. 1 At the time of commencing employment, each employee executed a written employment agreement which contained, inter alia, a restrictive covenant by which the employee agreed that for a period of one year after termination of his employment he would not solicit any of Merrill Lynch’s customers whom he had serviced or whose name he had learned during his employment by Merrill Lynch. These agreements also provided…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Credit Alliance Corp. v. Philadelphia Minit-Man Car Wash Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. McLaughlin v. NolanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. HoveyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  4. Independent State Store Union v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Unionville-Chadds Ford School District v. RotteveelCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Diodato v. Wells Fargo Insurance Services, USA, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Bell Fuel Corp. v. CattolicoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Banks v. RyanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API