Legal Opinion
State v. Savio
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 19, 1996No. 1 CA-CR 95-0593PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GERBER, Judge.
Appellant Louis M. Savio (Savio) appeals his conviction for one count of manifesting an intent to solicit prostitution as provided by Phoenix City Code section 23-52(a)(3). The sole issue before us is whether this ordinance is vague and overbroad in violation of both the United States and the Arizona Constitutions. For reasons that follow, we hold that the ordinance is permissible under both constitutions.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On April 22, 1994, Savio was arrested and charged with manifesting an intent to solicit prostitution. Phoenix City Code section 23-52(a)(3),…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- City of Seattle v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department of Multnomah County v. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- State v. WesternArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Chicago v. PowellAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- City of Chicago v. Powell Replaces opinion filed June 30, 2000 then withdrawnAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- State v. HartwellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019