Legal Opinion

Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Shoemake

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided May 29, 2012No. 2011-CA-00179-COAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIS, P.J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. On April 14, 2009, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company filed a complaint against Richard Shoemake seeking reimbursement for workers’ compensation benefits paid on his behalf. Shoemake filed a motion for summary judgment, and Liberty Mutual filed a response and a cross-motion for summary judgment. The Newton County Circuit Court granted Shoe-make’s motion for summary judgment and denied Liberty Mutual’s motion for summary judgment. Liberty Mutual appeals.

¶ 2. We find that the circuit court erred in applying Alabama law to Liberty Mutual’s subrogation rights. Thus,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. CraftMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
  2. McDonald v. E. J. Lavino Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. McDaniel v. RitterMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Shelby County Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. INTERNATIONAL UNDERWRITERS v. LiaoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clinton Williams v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. ShoemakeMississippi Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Richard ShoemakeMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  4. SFR Services, LLC, Wild Oak Bay Owners Association, Inc. v. American Coastal Insurance CompanyFlorida Second District Court of Appeal · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API