Legal Opinion

Castro v. R. Goold & Son, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 8, 1954No. Civ. No. 8427PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.

This is an appeal from judgments entered in favor of defendants. Plaintiff and appellant, hereinafter called “Castro,” is a paving contractor and contracted with defendant B. Goold & Son, Inc., one of the two respondents, hereinafter called “Goold,” to perform certain paving work required to be done under a prime contract between Goold and Solano County Sanitation District No. 1. This prime contract called for the construction by Goold of a sewer system for the district. Defendant and respondent Pacific Indemnity Company, hereinafter called “surety,” was the surety on Goold’s performance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stoddard v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Pimentel v. the Hall-Baker Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Ventura & Ojai Valley Railway v. HartmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. National Pavements Corp. v. Hutchinson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sapin v. Security First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. De Castro & Co. v. Liberty Steamship of PanamaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API