Dutton v. Gibson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Justice.
This is the second appeal in this case. The nature of the case and the issues sufficiently appear from the report of the former appeal. Dutton v. Gibson, 222 Ala. 191, 131 So. 567.
The declarations of Straeener to the witness Prader were admissible, in evidence as explanatory of Stracener’s possession of the mules, and the objection to the question and the motion to exclude the answer were properly overruled. Drum & Ezekiel v. Harrison, 83 Ala. 384, 3 So. 715; Sitz & Co. v. Herzberg-Loveman D. G. Co., 194 Ala. 237, 69 So. 881; Nelson v. Iverson, 24 Ala. 9, 60 Am. Dec. 442; Shaw…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. KirschSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Nelson v. IversonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
- Drum & Ezekiel v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- German v. Brown & LeeperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
- Dillard v. SavageSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Southern Home Ins. Co. of the Carolinas v. BoatwrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Sims v. StruthersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Sims v. StruthersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957