Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Cole

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 16, 2009No. Nos. 106,299, 106,471, 106,474PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Y.C.J.

¶ 1 The first-impression issue presented to this Court on certiorari from the three interlocutory orders entered in condemnation proceedings is whether an application to withdraw funds which contains the phrase “pending trial on the issues by jury” constitutes a demand for a jury trial as required by title 69, section 1203 when the condemnor waits almost two years before filing a motion to strike the demand and only after the matter has been set on the jury sounding docket at least seven times and set for trial at least once. We answer yes.1

I. FACTS

¶ 2 Unless otherwise noted,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Public Service Co. v. B. Willis, C.P.A., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  2. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. PerdueSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  3. COUNTY COM'RS OF MUSKOGEE CO. v. LowerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. Transok Pipe Line Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. STATE ex rel. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION v. LAMAR ADVERTISING OF OKLAHOMA, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  2. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  3. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. Siegfried CompaniesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API