Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Perdue
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 9, 2008No. 105,297PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKauger, J.
T1 The issue presented is whether the trial court erred by confirming the amended report of the commissioners, despite the fact that ODOT filed an exception requesting the amended report nearly two years after the statutory filing period had expired. We hold that it did.
FACTS
T2 On July 2, 2004, the Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT) filed a petition to condemn two parcels of real property, about one and a half acres in total, along U.S. Highway 59 in LeFlore County in order to widen the highway. The property was owned by Charles G. Perdue and Linda Sharon Perdue…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hulsey v. Mid-America Preferred Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Horizons, Inc. v. Keo Leasing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 382Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Whitehorse v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Oklahoma City v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Powell v. DicksionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- State ex rel. Department of Transportation v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. MinorCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009
- Independent School District No. 5 of Tulsa County v. TaylorCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.