Legal Opinion
Gray v. Manklow (In Re Optical Technologies, Inc.)
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided July 27, 2000No. 8:98-cv-02382PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KOVACHEVICH, Chief Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on appeal from the entry of final summary judgment in Appellant’s Adversary Proceeding in the Bankruptcy Court below pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158.
I. Standard of Review
This Court functions as an appellate court in reviewing a bankruptcy court’s decision. 28 U.S.C. § 158. Findings of fact by the bankruptcy judge shall be upheld on appeal unless found to be clearly erroneous. See Bankruptcy Rule 8013; In re Downtown Properties, Ltd., 794 F.2d 647 (11th Cir.1986). A finding of fact is clearly erroneous when, although there is evidence to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Marvin Morris v. Harold RossCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re: Optical Technologies, Inc., Debtor. Delaine Gray, as Distribution Trustee for the Consolidated Debtors, Plaintiff v. Raymond Manklow, Jean Francois VincensCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Radnor Holdings Corp. v. Tennenbaum Capital Partners, LLC (In Re Radnor Holdings Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2006
- Graham v. Huntington National Bank (In re Medcorp, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
- Recomm Operations, Inc. v. Raymond ManklowCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Mathews v. CohenDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.