Waag v. Hamm
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
Defendants, Edward Hersey Hamm (“Hamm”) and Red River Valley Investments Company (“Red River”) (collectively, “defendants”), move for appointment of a receiver to maintain and protect certain real property located in Aspen, Colorado. Plaintiff, Linda Levin Waag (“Waag”), objects to receivership. Jurisdiction exists pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and this court’s inherent equity jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, I deny defendants’ motion.
I. BACKGROUND
The following material facts are undisputed unless otherwise noted. Waag and Hamm…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Booth v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Kelleam v. Maryland Casualty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Burnrite Coal Briquette Co. v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Aviation Supply Corporation v. R.S.B.I. Aerospace, Inc., Ross BarberCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Maxwell v. Enterprise Wall Paper Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harvest Worship Center v. Resound ChurchDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
- Harvest Worship Center v. Resound ChurchDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023
- Silverstein v. WolfDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Mesh Suture Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2020