Legal Opinion
Calculagraph Co. v. Automatic Time Stamp Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Decided April 9, 1907No. 9,548PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Equity. On merits of plea.
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEE, District Judge.
This is a suit for infringement of the Abbott and' Hamilton patents. The question for decision arises on a plea in bar on the ground of res adjudicata. The record shows that one Wilson was individually engaged in business under the name of the Automatic Time Stamp Company, and on April 1, 1903, before the commencement of an action against him in the First Circuit for infringement of the patents in suit, he was succeeded in business by the defendant the Automatic Time Stamp Company, a corporation. He was charged in the bill with infringement, and a recovery for profits…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lane v. WeldsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- Carroll v. GoldschmidtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
- Ingersoll v. JewettU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1879
- Bate Refrigerating Co. v. GillettUnited States Circuit Court · 1887
3Cited by3 opinions
- Green v. WahlSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Abington v. TownsendSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
- Central Oregon Irrigation Co. v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1923