Ingersoll v. Jewett
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, District Judge.
The proofs taken under the bill, plea and replication present the question of the effect of a former adjudication against the validity of the complainant’s patent. The plea sets up this former adjudication as an estoppel in favor •of the present defendants. The bill charges infringement, by the defendants, of letters patent [No. 119.705] granted to Eugene A. Heath, bearing date October 10th, 1871, for .an improvement in metallic cuspidors. The plea alleges, that, in June. 1875, the complainant filed a bill, in the United States circuit court for the district of New…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Campbell v. . HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Ingersoll v. TurnerUnited States Circuit Court · 1877
3Cited by7 opinions
- Carroll v. GoldschmidtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
- Rowe v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- Clip Bar Mfg. Co. v. Steel Protected Concrete Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1913
- Confectioners' Machinery & Manufacturing Co. v. Racine Engine & Machinery Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1908
- Consolidated Roller-Mill Co. v. George T. Smith Middlings Purifier Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.