Corbitt v. Mangum
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
These consolidated appeals were originally filed as a class action in an effort to collect refunds of ad valorem taxes paid based upon a "fair market" valuation rather than upon the appropriate "current use" valuation. The trial court denied the defendants' motions for summary judgment; those motions were based upon the fact that the plaintiffs had failed to file a claim with the county commission seeking a refund of ad valorem taxes illegally collected. The plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment was granted, on the authority of Eagerton v.Williams, 433 So.2d 436 (Ala. 1983), and White…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Eagerton v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Thorn v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Ward v. Saben Appliance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barnett v. Sylacauga AutoplexDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1997
- Alabama Mutual Insurance Corp. v. City of VernonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
- Wood v. CITY OF LANETTDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2008
- Ruffin v. ClarkDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2019