Legal Opinion

State v. Prineas

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 14, 2011No. 2010AP2154PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NEUBAUER, PJ.

¶ 1. Anthony L. Prineas appeals from a trial court order and a supplemental order *365denying his motion for postconviction relief. Prineas was convicted of two counts of sexual assault following a jury trial. The primary dispute at trial was whether the sexual contact between Prineas and the complainant, KAC, was consensual. Although KAC testified that she repeatedly told Prineas "no" and that she wanted to leave, the court excluded on hearsay grounds Prineas' testimony of what KAC said during the encounter. We conclude the evidence was erroneously excluded. The evidence of KAC's…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State v. HarveyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. ThielWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Martindale v. RippWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Holt, Maurice v. Radtke, DylonDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API