Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1948No. 36435PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberds, J.

'■ Appellant appeals from" a conviction of assault with intent to murder his father. The record presents a substantial issue of fact for the jury.

We have considered the assignment relating to the State’s only instruction. Its concluding clause “and this is true regardless of every other fact and circumstance in this case” has been condemned many times. Cole v. State, 172 Miss. 19, 159 So. 296, 298; Earl v. State, 168 Miss. 124, 151 So. 172. We are of the opinion, however, that the issues and controlling principles were sufficiently set out in the instructions as a whole and that no reversible…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. DesloversSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1917
  2. Carter v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Coles v. HarschOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Davenport v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Vickers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Western Fire Truck, Inc. v. Emergency One, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. State v. FeelerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Fidelity National Bank v. Center Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1984
  4. State v. MotesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. MotesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API