Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Motes

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 5, 1975No. 20005Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBussey, Justice

(concurring and dissenting) :

While in accord with much of the majority opinion of the Court, I find myself in disagreement as to certain points. I seriously question the Court’s construction of code sections 1-65, 26-7.1, and 26-7.2. The plain language of section 26-7.2 says that unless the other sections have been complied with no such statement shall be admissible in any case or any reference be made to it in the trial of any case. Nevertheless, assuming that such a statement is otherwise competent and admissible, I cannot conceive of the legislature having intended to deprive an individual…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. People v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Hunter v. HunterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Hicks v. HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Dalton v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API