In Re AJ Lane & Co., Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JAMES F. QUEENAN, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
The Debtor Andrew J. Lane moves to reject, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 365, a repurchase option contained in his deed of property in Ontario, California which he now wishes to sell rather than develop. Opposed to the motion is the successor-in-interest to the original grantor, The motion was granted by order dated November 20, 1989, which the court issued while this opinion was in draft form in order to facilitate a pending sale.
The facts are undisputed. Andrew J. Lane (“the Debtor”), as well as the other affiliated debtors in these administratively…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ohio v. KovacsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Group of Institutional Investors v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P.R. Co., and 9 Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Lubrizol Enterprises, Inc. v. Richmond Metal Finishers, Inc., in Re Richmond Metal Finishers, Inc., DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- COR Route 5 Co. v. Penn Traffic Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- In Re Robert L. Helms Construction And Development Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- In Re Trans World Airlines, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2001
- In Re Riodizio, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- In Re Parkwood Realty Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.