Legal Opinion

Steiner v. Markel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 2009No. 62 MAP 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

968 A.2d 1253 (2009)

Clifford L. STEINER and Bonnie J. Steiner, Appellees

v.

John F. MARKEL, Esquire and Nikolaus & Hohenadel, LLP, Appellants.

No. 62 MAP 2008.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued December 2, 2008.

Decided April 29, 2009.

Thomas A. French, Cory Allen Iannacone, Rhoads & Sinon, L.L.P., Harrisburg, for John F. Markel, Esquire and Nikolaus & Hohenadel, LLP, appellants.

Guy Paul Beneventano, Nauman, Smith, Shissler & Hall, L.L.P., Harrisburg, for Clifford L. and Bonnie J. Steiner, appellees.

BEFORE: CASTILLE, C.J., SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD, McCAFFERY and GREENSPAN, JJ.

OPINION

Justice…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wiegand v. WiegandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Bailey v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Estate of Swift Ex Rel. Swift v. Northeastern Hospital of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Kituskie v. CorbmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dorsey v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API