Legal Opinion

Hime v. Florida Real Estate Commission

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 21, 1952PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

61 So.2d 182 (1952)

HIME

v.

FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION et al.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division A.

October 21, 1952.

Rehearing Denied November 20, 1952.

David B. Newsom and Rosenhouse & Rosenhouse, Miami, for appellant.

W.H. Poe, Orlando, for appellee.

TERRELL, Justice.

The Florida Real Estate Commission filed an information charging that defendant Charley Hime, while acting as a real estate broker for Florence Zelt, accepted the sum of $800 from his employer, as earnest money for the purchase of certain real estate and that he converted said money to his own use. The information also charged that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. McElvySupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. State Ex Rel. Davis v. RoseSupreme Court of Florida · 1929

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mcknight v. Florida Real Estate CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  2. Nicks v. DEPT. OF BUSINESS AND PROF. REG.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. Florida State Board of Medical Examiners v. JamesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Buchman v. State Board of AccountancySupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  5. Harper v. CooperDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API